EU-ASIA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

29 – 30 OCTOBER 2008, IMPIANA CASUARINA HOTEL

 

The opening ceremony of the EU-Asia Solid Waste Management Conference was

graced by YAB Dato’ Seri Ir. Hj. Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin, The Chief

Minister of Perak by the traditional Malay Gong accompanied by H.E. Vincent Piket,

Ambassador and Head of Delegation of the European Commission to Malaysia; YB

Nga Kor Ming, Chairman of Standing Committee on Education, Local Government

and Housing and Public Transport, Perak State Executive Councillor; DatoLeong

Kin Mun, Conference Director and Dato’ Dr. Ir. Abu Bakar Jaafar, President,

Association of Environmental Consultants & Companies in Malaysia (AECCOM).

(from left to right)

 

The EU-Asia Solid Waste Management Conference was successfully held

on 29-30 October 2008 at Impiana Casuarina Hotel in Ipoh, Perak,

Malaysia. More than 400 participants, including 80 foreign delegates from 18

countries Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Spain, UK, Estonia, India,

Cambodia, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives, Singapore, Thailand, Bhutan,

South Africa, Iran and Laos have attended the conference together with 320

Malaysian participants. YAB Dato’ Seri Ir. Hj. Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin,

The Chief Minister of Perak officiated this auspicious event at the Banquet Hall of Perak Darul

Ridzuan Building, while H.E. Vincent Piket, Ambassador and Head of Delegation of the

European Commission to Malaysia delivered a Special Address and also YB Nga Kor Ming,

Chairman of Standing Committee on Education, Local Government and Housing and Public

Transport, Perak delivered the Welcoming Address during the opening ceremony of the Conference.

 

The participants for this conference consist of urban environmental officers (administrators and

engineers) in charge of solid waste management (SWM) from the public sector, Non-Government

Organisations (NGOs), institution of higher learning and research institutions; representatives

from the private sector involved in SWM such as recycling companies, waste management

concessionaires, environmental consultants and contractors providing various services such

as equipment supplies, technology consultancy, environmental engineering, waste audit and

consultancy services etc. The conference served as an intellectual platform and dialogue for

EU-Asia solid waste management (SWM) practitioners to exchange experiences and best

practices. The 2-day Conference included a total of 7 sessions, with 3 parallel sessions.

The Sessions are EU-Asia Solid Waste Management Experience, Malaysia Perspective on

Solid Waste Management; Technology Innovations for Future Solid Waste Management;

EU Policy and Regulatory Framework on Solid Waste Management; Findings of International

Project’ Economic Instrument and Financing Methods and Best Practices and Case Studies

related to SWM from the EU and Asia’s perspectives. A total of 26 speakers presented their

papers at the international conference, including 13 well known European speakers and 13

Asian speakers.

 

Well known Asian speakers include:

Dr. Nadzri Yahaya, Director General, National Solid Waste Management Department, Ministry of

Housing and Local Government

Prof. Dr. P. Agamuthu, Science and Environmental Management Division, Institute of Biological

Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya

Ms. Sarifah Yaakob, Senior Manager, Alam Flora Sdn Bhd.

Dato’ Dr. Ir. Abu Bakar Jaafar President, Association of Environmental Consultants & Companies

in Malaysia (AECCOM)

 

 

(From left to right) Dato’ Dr. Ir. Abu Bakar Jaafar, President, Association of Environmental

Consultants & Companies in Malaysia (AECCOM); Mr. Holger Robrecht, Director, Sustainability

Management, ICLEI European Secretariat GmbH, Germany;  Mr. Christian Fisher, Senior

Consultant, Danish Topic Centre on Waste & Resources (DTC-WR); Mr. Larry O’ Toole,

Operations Director, Waste & Energy Department of RPS Consulting Engineers, Ireland;

Mr. Keith Newman, Director, Cayenne Limited, UK and Dr. Andrew Farmer, Senior Fellow,

Head of Pollution & Climate Team, Institute for European Environmental Policies (IEEP), UK

 

SPECIAL ADDRESS

The EU’s Approach to Waste Prevention and Waste Recycling

 

 

In the last 30 years waste has been at the centre of EU environment

policy and substantial progress has been made. Heavily polluting

landfills and incinerators are being cleaned up. New techniques have

been developed for the treatment of hazardous waste. Hazardous

substances are being removed from vehicles and electrical and

electronic equipment. The levels of dioxins and other emissions from

incineration are being reduced. The waste management and

recycling sector has a high growth rate and has an estimated

turnover of €100 billion in the entire EU. It is labour intensive and

provides between 1.2 and 1.5 million jobs. With time, waste is

increasingly seen as a valuable resource for industry. Approaches

such as reuse, recycling and energy recovery are starting to be

applied to regulated wastes. Diversion of biodegradable waste from

    H.E. Vincent Piket                     landfills and increasing recycling and recovery are reducing greenhouse

   Ambassador and Head of            gas emissions, thereby tackling one of the greatest environmental

   Delegation of the European          challenges the world. Nevertheless, the unsustainable trends in waste

   Commission to Malaysia              generation and the policy issues remain causes for concern. This is

       specially relevant to the Asian region, where growing prosperity inevitably

       also means growing consumption – and thus more waste.

 

The foundation of the EU regulatory structure on waste is the Waste Framework Directive, adopted in

1975. It obliges Member States to ensure that waste is managed properly and it establishes a

hierarchy for waste management. This means that, ideally, waste

should be prevented and what cannot be prevented should be re-used, recycled and recovered as much as

feasible, with landfill being used as little as possible.

 

This legislative basis has delivered significant environmental benefits and has resulted in making the

recycling of waste part of normal industrial practice. For example, at least 50% of paper and steel, 43% of

glass and 40% of non-ferrous metals produced in the EU are currently made out of recycled materials.

Furthermore, the recycling of major materials and diverting bio-waste from landfill and treating landfill gas

has enabled EU industry to reduce total greenhouse gas emissions by more than 5%.

 

International Panel on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources was set up last year. This panel

will play a key role in taking these issues forward globally. Of the 19 scientists who make up the Panel,

5 are from Asia. However, only two Asian countries, China and Japan, have so far joined the Panel’s

steering committee.

 

The EU has been supporting sustainable waste management in Asia for many years. The €55

million Asia Pro Eco programme, which ran from 2002-2006. Its successor programme, the €90 million

‘SWITCH-Asia’ programme, is focused on promoting sustainable production and consumption throughout

the region, mainly among Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.

 

Indeed, policies aimed at sound waste management and sustainable resource use can stimulate

investment in knowhow and infrastructure.

 

 

Multi-stakeholders Consultative Meeting

The meeting which was chaired by Dato’ Dr. Ir. Abu Bakar Jaafar,

The President of the Association of Environmental Consultants &

Companies in Malaysia (AECCOM), concluded that “waste separation

at source” is the key solution that is necessarily required in any efforts

towards the creation of “waste recycling industry” as envisaged in

the Outline Perspective Plan (2001- 2010) (OPP3) of Malaysia, and

articulated in the last two 5-year Malaysia Plans.

                                                                                                      Photo taken during Multi-stakeholders

        Consultative Meeting at Impiana Casuarina Ipoh.

FIRST ORDER OF POLICY AND REGULATORY INTERVENTION       

The first order of intervention would be a regulatory requirement that “a waste generator shall separate

its waste into at least three separate streams: “perishable”, “toxic and hazardous waste”, and “non-perishable”.

In order to promote such an intervention, it is recommended that every household is provided with the first set

of 3- types of bin, “free”. Those who collect and sort out “toxic and hazardous waste” from other streams of

waste would be rewarded “financially” when they deposit such materials at designated “waste recovery centres”.

 

SECOND ORDER OF POLICY AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTERVENTION

By the “Proximity Principle”, the supply of in-situ composters be introduced to those households

with landed-properties in order to recover their “perishable waste” as “compost-materials” which could

be marketed for plant-nursery and landscaping. In the case of “perishable waste” generated by others,

anaerobic digestion technology could be introduced in order to generate methane gas or compressed

natural gas “renewable energy”. Such an innovation would also attract “carbon credit” under the

Kyoto Protocol.

 

THIRD ORDER OF POLICY, REGULATORY, AND MARKET INTERVENTION

For non-perishable waste, it could further sort out at source, should there be a market demand

for recyclables such as “plastics”, “paper”, “glass”, and “metals” including aluminium and steel. To

create demand for such recyclables, it would require another set of policy interventions.

 

FOURTH ORDER OF POLICY INTERVENTION

There is a limit to the extent of which certain types of waste could be recycled. Instead of these

materials be sent to landfill for disposal, it is highly recommended that “resource recovery” and

“waste-to-energy” plants be promoted and established. Thus, a very attractive electricity tariff

ought to be given to such facilities, which essentially generate “renewable energy”.

 

FIFTH ORDER OF INTERVENTION

As illustrated in Figure 1 (bottom of page), there shall be no more landfills, sanitary or otherwise, to

be built. Instead, those “unwanted” materials should be put in “repository”; these materials

would be easily “recoverable” once they command some economic values.

 

CONCLUSION

In short, the Conference has come to a successful conclusion by having all the invited stakeholders

Move towards a sustainable management of “costly” solid waste into “valuable” resource such as

materials” and “renewable energy”.

 

 

 

Back